[tied] Re: Note on palatals

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...> wrote:

> If centum and satem was a shibboleth before the split, does this
> imply that there was only one velar/palatal series, not separate
> velar and palatal?
> >
> > Andrew

I think Andrew might be interested in Torsten's paper on
shibbolethization:

http://www.angelfire.com/rant/tgpedersen/Shibbolethisation.html

Lars