From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 44717
Date: 2006-05-27
>On Čet, svibanj 25, 2006 11:15 am, Miguel Carrasquer reče:Typo. Two typos in fact: it's blóde:ti, and Fraenkel
>> On Wed, 24 May 2006 11:31:53 +0200 (CEST), Mate Kapović
>> <mkapovic@...> wrote:
>>>
>>>The classical examples are Lith. núogas but obuoly~s.
>>
>> There are also a few counterexamples: stógas "roof"
>> (*stog-), rógas "grave" (*rog-), blodé:ti "talk
>> nonsense"(*bhlog-). This might suggest that there was an
>> overlap between Winter's law and the a/o-merger.
>
>Maybe they are later derivatives?
>What is this bloDé:ti anyway? How can it be from *bhloG-?