Re: [tied] Re: i-verbs in Baltic and Slavic

On Thu, 25 May 2006 22:09:29 +0200, Piotr Gasiorowski
<gpiotr@...> wrote:

>On 2006-05-25 21:25, Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
>
>> Right: domh2-éye- > domáye- > doma:-. In <domitus>, it
>> looks like the causative suffix is indeed completely
>> deleted: *domh2-tós > domitus.
>
>This is a little perverse. Both Lat. domitus and Skt. damita- _may_ go
>back to *domh2itó-, while Lat. monitus and Skt. ma:nita- _must_ go back
>to *monitó-. It seems ony natural to conclude that *mon-éje- and
>*domh2-éje- form their deverbal adjectives in the same way. *dom&2tó-
>buys you nothing -- it would be just another aberrant form, even harder
>to explain than the *monitó- type.

Sorry, I wasn't thinking right. I somehow had *ih2 in my
head instead of *h2i.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...