From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 44385
Date: 2006-04-22
> Of course, *wé:kWs is _not_ what we see if Pokorny is to beWe see *wo:kW-s (Lat. vox, RV va:c-, TB wek, Gk. acc.sg. opa < *wokW-m.,
> reliable.
> It is rather *wékWos (note: short *e!).This is an -es-stem (nom./acc. *wékW-os, gen. *wékW-es-e/os ...).
> Do you know of a language displaying such a singular?Gk. épos, RV vácas-, Av. vac^ah-.