Re: [tied] Re: IE root melH-

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 44061
Date: 2006-03-31

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:43 PM
Subject: [tied] Re: IE root melH-

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Ryan" <proto-language@...>
wrote:
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Patrick Ryan<mailto:proto-language@...>
>   To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com<mailto:cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>   Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 12:49 PM
>   Subject: Re: [tied] Re: IE root melH-
>
>
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Abdullah Konushevci<mailto:akonushevci@...>
>     To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com<mailto:cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>     Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:38 AM
>     Subject: Re: [tied] Re: IE root melH-
>
>
>     On 3/31/06, Patrick Ryan <proto-language@...<mailto:proto-
language@...>> wrote:
>
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         From: Abdullah Konushevci<mailto:akonushevci@...>
>         To:
cybalist@yahoogroups.com<mailto:cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>         Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 9:41 AM
>         Subject: [tied] Re: IE root melH-
>
>
>         --- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com<mailto:cybalist@yahoogroups.com>, "bily_dim"
 <bily_dim@> wrote:
>         >
>         >
>         > Dear colleagues,
>         > what could you say about the identification of the
laryngeal in the
>         IE
>         > root melH- "to grind"?
>         >
>         > Biliana Mihaylova
>         ************
>         I think that it will be *H1, for Alb.
<blozhdë> 'perforated
>         thoroughly' should be probably from *mleH1-zd-eH2 > mle:-
zd-aH2 >
>         blozhdë, for *e: > Alb. /o/.
>
>         Konushevci
>
>         ***
>         Patrick:
>
>         I doubt very seriously that <blozhdë> is derived from *m.lé
(:); the semantics just do not match.
>
>         The commonest attested PIE formative with verbs, in my
uninteresting opinion, was -*Ha (from Nostratic -*?a), which created
a stative verbal form.
>
>         Because of its constitution with /a/, the laryngealist's
equivalent would be *H2.
>
>         We actually have some IE forms which can be derived from
*m.l6Ha(:) (*mla:), which meant 'ground up, pulverized'.
>
>         *H1 (my *He) is not known by me to be a verbal formant
(extension).
>
>         ***
>
>
>     As well Alb. <bluej/bluaj> 'to grind, crush, mill' should be
from *mleH1-n-yo > ble:nyo, for long *e is usually diphthonged
followed by nasal.
>
>     ***
>     Patrick:
>
>     Why not simply *m.lé:-n-yo-?
>
>     ***
For syllabic /m./ yields Alb. <a> and in this case we will have
aluenj/aluanj.

***
Patrick:
 
OK. Then mlé:-n-yo.
 
The point was whether we need to reconstruct *H. Perhaps Miguel has some way of differentiating *e: from *e(:)H.
 
***