From: Anders R. Joergensen
Message: 43895
Date: 2006-03-16
> --- "Anders R. Joergensen" <ollga_loudec@...>Well, if we ignore British Celtic *wor (and I don't see how we can),
> > > > for- is probably not a case of rounding, but
> > rather
> > > > influenced by
> > > > *upo > *wo
> > >
> > > It could be analogy, but if the other examples
> > are
> > > true it's not necessary.
> >
> > Well then you just give up explaining the British
> > Celtic reflex
> > *wor...
>
> I'm not giving up; initial w in P-Celtic can cause
> rounding independent of the Irish types.
> >Yes, but not the same thing and certainly not conditioned in the
> > Yes, this is u-infection, not the same as influence
> > from a
> > labiovelar (though it may have happened at the same
> > time).
>
> Sihler says final u causes rounding and drops;
> spelling daur indicating darW etc., and if so the
> roundings would be for the same reason at the same
> time.
>OIr. (DIL) fescor is translated 'evening, eventide, vespers', W
> > > > borrowing from
> > > > Latin vesper, just like W gosper, Bret. gousper
> > >
> > > It's no borrowing; "evening" W ucher; Co
> > gurth-uher
> > > from my *wesxWeros (we>wi>wu>u as ugeint "twenty")
> > in
> > > Proto-Celtic.
> >
> > How can you tell whether it's inherited or borrowed?
>
> I can't be completely sure fescor is inherited, but
> since W ucher; Co gurth-uher exist and are evidence
> toward my stage *wesxWeros I think this makes it more
> likely. In another word I have initial *sxW > kW in
> Irish, so s-xW > s-kW seems to fit (also sw > p in
> piuthar Gaelic, s/fiur OIr, perhaps through sw > sf to
> account for all forms and lenition?).
>