From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 43655
Date: 2006-03-05
> > What is strange also here, is that even in PAlb, the PIE *g'Hlh3-PIE
> > will give PAlb *gál- (for PIE *l.h3/*r.h3> PAlb *ar/*al see also
> > *prh3-wo > Alb *parë 'first')PAlb
> >
> > Derivation:
> > PIE *g'Hlh3- > [g'/l > g/l] > Early-PAlb *gHlh3- [l.h3 > al~la]
>
> > PAlb *gál-
> >
> > However because I doubt that the source of Latin galbinus was a
> > *gal-b-ina < PIE *g'Hlh3-bh-ino, from here my questionregarding a
> > right source.--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel J. Milton" <dmilt1896@...>
> >
> > Thanks again for any help.
> > Marius
> >
>googling
> I've got a vague memory of a thread on "galbinus", the Emperor
> Galba, etc. on Cybalist a couple of years ago. I could be wrong --
> maybe it was only that something on Cybalist lead to further
> on these.kind
> Someone with an effective search method for Cybalist might be
> enough to check.I found the discussion (it was before my arrival here) at :
> Dan
> ******
> Latin <galbus>, <galbinus> etc.a) there is no -b- in Germanic
>are either unrelated or borrowed (much more likely the latter,
>IMO); at any ratethey can't be inherited reflexes of the PIE term >
>in Latin.
>Piotr
> From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>a.+ In addition the Germanic forms are mainly based on:
> There is no *b in Germanic: OE geolo > yellow, OS, OHG gelo (G.
> gelwes) > Gelb (with b < w), Du. geel, dial. geluw.