From: Sean Whalen
Message: 43127
Date: 2006-01-27
>And v remains (*H3ovipax- > hoviv "shepherd" *vek^s
> --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> >
> > How does this prove the presence of original v ?
> > What's wrong with
> > w > M > m before n (or better w > G > m before n)
> > and w > v?
>
> Because w > g (*weden- > get
> *dwo:u > *tgu: > erku
> *daxiwr- > taigr).
> vecH "six" vorghos > varg "lynx").__________________________________________________