Re: [tied] I'm back with a few questions

From: Sean Whalen
Message: 43118
Date: 2006-01-26

--- andrew jarrette <jarretteandrew@...>
wrote:
>
>*wemh1-o: > *wemo: > vomo: is regular (*e > o after
*w or *l if followed
>by a nasal plus a back vowel) and generalised across
the paradigm.

I know of this change (e.g. homo), but why would
*wemo: be generalized across the paradigm?

There's no need for analogy in this particular
case; unlike n it's possible that older e > o between
w and m regardless of the following vowel (just as
with L (velar l)).

welti
weLti
woLti
woLt
wuLt

vult "wants"





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com