Re: [tied] PIE suffix *-ro - 'similar-with'

On 2006-01-10 16:15, tgpedersen wrote:

> Why not *-n- + *-t- > *-nt-? That would mean one would have to find
> a semantically oriented explanation, rather than phonetic one for
> the respective occurrence of *-n-, *-t- and *-nt-, which seems more
> promising to me.

You've lost me. Which of the two seems more promising?

Piotr