From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 42869
Date: 2006-01-11
>takes
> On 2006-01-07 15:06, tgpedersen wrote:
>
> > How about this: -r is the endingless locative of n-stems. That
> > care of the Germanic 'locatives' in -r (here, there etc) too.and
>
> My original intention was a "grand unification" of *-tó-, *-nó-
> *-ró- as reflexes of a single type. As far as I can see, the onlybelonging to
> possible common denominator for them is *-nt- plus thematising
> derivation. *X-ó- adjectives generally mean 'pertaining or
> X, connected with X', so something like *kWr.-t-ó- 'done', ifderived
> from the active participle *kW-ént- 'doing' (referring to theagent),
> makes sense as 'connected with the doer', more or less.usually
>
> As for the endingless locatives of heteroclitic _nouns_, they
> show a final *-n plus suffixal stress, which _may_ indicate a lostThus,
> enclitic (perhaps identical with what otherwise appears as *-i).
> we have *ud-én rather that *!*wéd-r. In compounds, on the otherhand,
> the form with *-r is preferred, cf. RV ahar-ahar- 'day by day' vs.1. I doubt that the "r" of 'ahar' has something to do with the
> loc.sg. ahan, ah(a)ni.
>
> Piotr