From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 42768
Date: 2006-01-04
>*nebh-
> alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> >
> > (outside of the topic: Skt. nábhas is derived (see Lubotsky) as
> > o- also Grk. néphos is derived (see Beekes) as *nebh-o- too (butof
> > course o is not part of the PIE-root *nebh-)example of
>
> You must have misunderstood something. The noun is a showcase
> an -es-stem neuter, with the nom./acc. in *-os (with a _zero_suffix
> inflectioanl ending!), gen.sg. in *-es-os, etc. The stem-forming
> is therefore *-es-, alternating apophonically with *-os (cf. Slavice/os).
> nebo, gen. nebese, Gk. nepHos, gen. nepHeos < *nebH-os, *nebH-es-
> Your *nebH-o- simply doesn't exist.It's ok now. Thanks Piotr.
>
> Piotr