From: george knysh
Message: 42512
Date: 2005-12-15
>****GK: As Dan and Piotr have pointed out, "niger" is
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Piotr Gasiorowski" <gpiotr@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 1:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [tied] "Niggers of India"
>
>
> > Daniel J. Milton wrote:
> >
> > > Patrick, explain your interpretation of <niger>
> ("etym. dub." in
> > > the references I have handy).
> > > For a start, is there any reason to believe
> that the word
> > > primarily referred to persons, dark or
> thin-haired? The adjective
> > > seems to have gone with dark skies, woods,
> plants, etc. just as readily.
> >
> > It means 'black' or 'dusky, gloomy, mournful,
> unlucky, bad...', and
> > almost always refers to "other things" rather than
> humans (except when
> > used as a surname). It is often contrasted with
> <albus> or <candidus>
> > (never with, say, <pilo:sus> or <villo:sus>) and
> treated as a synonym of
> > <ater> or <umbro:sus>. As for its derivatives, see
> <nigror> 'blackness',
> > <nigresco:> 'turn black, grow dark', etc. Surely,
> <nigrescentes dentes>
> > means 'teeth going black', not *'teeth losing
> hair'.
> >
> > Piotr
>
>
> ***
> Patrick:
>
> PIE had words that properly (originally) meant
> 'black' (*mer-) or 'gray'
> (*k^er-).
>
> I was not suggesting that /niger/ meant 'hairless'
> or 'scantily haired' in
> Latin - ever.
>
> But rather that the term _originated_ as a
> designation for people
> _incapable_ of growing a 'mane', loosely falling
> hair behind the head:
> 'locks', which was subsequently applied to black
> Africans, many of whom are
> notable in this respect.
>__________________________________________________