Re: Substrates in Reconstructed-PIE itself??

From: squilluncus
Message: 42465
Date: 2005-12-09

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>
> > Eneolithic? Is that a hybrid for Chalcolithic? I gather it is
> > "a(h)eneus" lying behind. Is there any difference between the
terms?
>
> Both terms refer to the same "Copper-Stone Age" (intermediate
between
> Neolithic and Bronze). <aƫneus> (ahe:neus) is quadrisyllabic in
Latin,
> so <Aeneolithic> is more correct (though still a Latino-Greek
hybrid),
> and Eneolithic (the more frequent variant in this Age of Classical
> Decline) owes its existemce to false analogy (<encyclop(a)edia>
etc.).
>
Thanks. What I suspected. But no hybrids for me! I will use
Chalcolithic and recommend to the rest of the world to do the same.

Lars