Re: [tied] Proto-Albanian Timeframes

> Thanks a lot, Abdullah.
> Piotr, you need to add an argument to the following question:
> 'Why -(ë)shti in madhështi: couldn't be added later?"
>
> I ask this because -(ë)shti seems to be an 'active' suffix in
> Albanian...
>
> Best Regards,
> Marius
>

And also what is the source of this final -i: (knowing that i:>i in
PAlb.)?
I ask this because if it shoud be a tj- there...for sure the suffix
(ot at least its later part) was added later.

Marius