From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 42350
Date: 2005-11-30
>Not if he's talking about a merger of Latin /ae/ and /e:/. That sound
> As regarding the timeframe of Latin ae>e Rosetti indicates that
> Varro talked about e for ae (in the countryside) indicating hedus
> against haedus.
>
> Varro => 116 BC-27? BC see at
> http://evansexperientialism.freewebspace.com/varronis_latin.htm
>
> So we can supposed that Latin ae > e became general (= finished) in
> sec I CE