From: mkelkar2003
Message: 41932
Date: 2005-11-08
>Mr. Shrikant Talageri's reply to Prof Witzel's critique can be found at:
> What excellent resources you have provided for us!
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Patrick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Francesco Brighenti" <frabrig@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:23 AM
> Subject: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)
> Languages
>
>
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For this [OIT] scenario to be proven wrong once and for all, it
> > should be > proven wrong for any possible value of the parameters
> > you ask me to > specify (and the number of possible values for each
> > parameter is > finite and relatively small, so it should be
> > practically possible > too). If I had provided any values, you might
> > be able to prove the > scenario wrong for exactly those values, but
> > _not_ (obviously) for > any other given set of parameter values. So
> > the menace of this > scenario being possibly right would live on.
> >
> >
> > Read these first. Then come back.
> >
> > http://www.bharatvani.org/books/rig/
> > http://users.primushost.com/~india/ejvs/ejvs0702/ejvs0702article.pdf
> >
> > Regards,
> > Francesco Brighenti
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>