Re: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)

On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:56:05 +0000, mkelkar2003
<smykelkar@...> wrote:

>--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...> wrote:
>>
>> At 7:34:52 PM on Saturday, November 5, 2005, mkelkar2003
>> wrote:
>>
>> > As I have noted already IE linguists H. H. Hock and
>> > linguists Johanna Nichols are not in disfavor of a IE
>> > homeland in the Indian subcontinent.
>>
>> That you have made the claim before doesn't make it true.
>> Certainly Hock argued against the out-of-India hypothesis in
>> 1999. And Bactria-Sogdiana isn't India.
>>
>> Brian
>
>I said Indian Subcontinent not the modern nation state of India.

Bactria-Sogdiana is not in the Indian Subcontinent.

>About Hock, no need to take my word for it. See p.9 bottom of the
>page, and p. 14 second para,
>
><http://www.omilosmeleton.gr/pdf/ait_and_scholarship.pdf>

On p. 14 it is said:

"He [Hock] states also that the PIE could "a priori" have
been "originally spoken in India" (p. 11) and rejects the
idea ..."


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...