Re: [tied] Re: Proto Vedic Continuity Theory of Bharatiya (Indian)

--- Francesco Brighenti <frabrig@...> wrote:
(in response to Kelkar citing Kalyanamaran)

> The scholars whose Indo-European linguistic theories
> you so
> tenaciously combat no longer entertain the old view
> that an invasion
> was responsible for the introduction of Indo-Aryan
> languages in
> South Asia. The only notable exception is nowadays
> represented by
> Asko Parpola, who unconvincingly postulates a series
> of proto-
> historic Indo-Aryan invasions of the Indian
> subcontinent.

****GK: There's been a lot of back and forth on this
list about this issue. Is the above comment (about all
scholars save Parpola) a suggestion that India is now
accepted by them as the (or part of the) IE homeland?
Or does it mean something else? And if so, what?****





__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com