Re: [tied] Slavic palatalistions: why /c^/, /c/?

It's definitely /k'/ in Standard Macedonian (I've done 3 years of it so I'm
pretty sure).

Mate

----- Original Message -----
From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Slavic palatalistions: why /c^/, /c/?


> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:22:00 +0200, Mate Kapovic
> <mkapovic@...> wrote:
>
>>Yup. No paradigms here. Since it's originally *tj, C^akavian /t'/ must be
>>the oldest one and we should derive Macedonian /k'/ from older *t'.
>
> Is the Macedonian sound really /k'/ (c.q. /g'/)? I've never
> heard much spoken Macedonian, but when I just listened to a
> pronunciation guide on the net (I forget the URL), what I
> heard was indistinguishable from <c'> and <dj>. Perhaps
> there are different dialect variants, like there are also
> Macedonian dialects that have "Bulgarian" /s^t/ and /z^d/.
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>