Re: [tied] Anatolian

glen gordon wrote:

> Grzegorz:
>> Once again, there was a single PIE language, [...]
>
> Stating it repeatedly doesn't make it so.
>
>
>> Just like there was a single Proto-Romance language
>
> Again, no.

Hahaha, so riduculous, really. If you know more proto-Romance languages than
Latin, count them out here.

>> a single Proto-Modern-Greek dialect
>
> Definitely not.

Do you know that what you try doing is just insolent? If you do not agree
with my opinion, present yours instead of keeping repeating all the same! I
have written why I think like I think. You have not. This is not any
discussion.

>> a single Proto-Indic (Vedic), a single
>> Proto-Slavic, a single Proto-Germanic...
>
> No, no and no.

Stating it repeatedly doesn't make it so. Your own words.

>> a single Proto-Altaic, a single Proto-Nostratic,
>
> Clearly you haven't studied the problems existent
> in those fields!

But you have studied, and you will not share the results of your study.

>> We have no basis for claiming contrary.
>
> We have _every_ basis for claiming the contrary.

Again, like in a kindergarten... So, what basis, for example?

>> And if you know such a basis, tell me about it.
>
> The constant, unstoppable evolution of language
> immediately shows that this viewpoint is false.
> Painfully simple.
>
>
> = gLeN

What evolution and what language? And what does it show? Unstoppable
evolution shows that there was not one Proto-Indo-European language? Sorry,
it is a complete nonsense. Painful nonsense. These two things have nothing
to do with one another.

Grzegorz J.



___________________________________________________________
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com