From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 41199
Date: 2005-10-10
> david_russell_watson <liberty@...> wrote:MHG bruoder, muoter > NHG Bruder, Mutter
>> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Jarrette
>> <anjarrette@...> wrote:
> Only English among Indo-European languages has examples
> like these - where originally rhyming words have diverged,
> with no apparent reason.
>>> Plus spellings like "ough" with its myriad pronunciations.But as David has now pointed out twice, this has nothing to
>> But as I wrote before, a spelling system is not a >
>> language. The only justification you have in citing >
>> English spelling is the manner in which it, having >
>> fossilized, is a reminder of past sound changes in >
>> English, not as a linguistically atypical feature itself
>> > of the English _language_.
> But English spelling is atypical among Indo-European
> languages. No other Indo-European language has a spelling
> system that is as inconsistent and exception-rich as does
> English.
>> Properly, you should cite only those sound changes whichThis isn't one of them, since -- once again -- it isn't an
>> > you consider atypical, not the spelling system that
>> merely _happens_ to reflect and remind us of some of
>> those changes.
> But I am recounting all aspects of English that make it
> nonconforming among Indo-European languages.
>>> Moreover the fact that it's called "English" though atHow much of the French lexicon do you think is Frankish in
>>> least 60% of its vocabulary is French or Latin, if not
>>> more, though I am aware that languages such as Albanian
>>> and Farsi also have a high foreign content.