Re: [tied] Re: PIE Ablaut

> I am still hoping for an answer to the questions posed in my 10/7 posting,
> and a definitive statement from Miguel on what "Brugmann's" Law must have
> as qualifications (exceptions) to make it work.
>
> Hopefully, it will explain why PIE *proti- does _not_ show up as OI
> <**prá:ti-> but rather as <práti->: we have PIE *o, we have an indubitably
> open syllable . . .

And saying it yet again, _not_ in the ablaut e/o
Hence no Brugmann.

Peter