Re: [tied] Re: Ie. *laywos/leh2iwos (was: ka and k^a)

From: P&G
Message: 40938
Date: 2005-10-01

>> > facio:, fe:ci:
>> > capio:, ce:pi:
>> > where the latter half should have o-grade (althought it doesn't).
> Because it's perf. sg.

Latin regularises all its perfects. Some show zero grade throughout, with
no sign of an original -o-. So we can't assume fe:ci or ce:pi had -o-
grade at the time they appear.

Peter