Me:
> What shows conclusively that we are dealing with
> short *e in these roots?
Miguel:
> The fact that *e is not long.
Cute. Very cute :) I'm simply asking, of the evidence
we *think* we have of short *e next to a marked
dorsal, is it really solid?
Let's take *legH- for example. We do have the
lengthened grade *le:gH- in Germanic *le:gaz 'low'.
What's that all about?
= gLeN
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com