[tied] Re: Ie. *laywos/leh2iwos (was: ka and k^a)

From: tgpedersen
Message: 40906
Date: 2005-09-30

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...>
wrote:
> tgpedersen wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I should have mentioned
> > facio:, fe:ci:
> > capio:, ce:pi:
> >
> > where the latter half should have o-grade (althought it doesn't).
>
> Why should it?


Because it's perf. sg.


Torsten