Re: [tied] Re: Ie. *laywos/leh2iwos (was: ka and k^a)

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 40895
Date: 2005-09-30

tgpedersen wrote:

> Sorry, I should have mentioned
> facio:, fe:ci:
> capio:, ce:pi:
>
> where the latter half should have o-grade (althought it doesn't).

Why should it?

Piotr

Previous in thread: 40886
Next in thread: 40906
Previous message: 40894
Next message: 40896