From: elmeras2000
Message: 40316
Date: 2005-09-22
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "elmeras2000" <jer@...> wrote:OS
>
> > > Are those regular Germanic reflexes of *bhe:r?
> >
> > Yes, that's what Germanic /e:/ yields in West Germanic: Goth. ga-
> > de:ths, OE dae:d, OS da:d, OHG ta:t; Goth. re:dan, OE rae:dan,
> > ra:dan, OHG ra:tan. Also Norse has /a:/.A change in people's speech fashions.
>
> I see. What caused the /e:/ to be lowered and centralized to /a:/
> ~ /&:/ (where '&' = OE <ae>)?
> > As for the type of root noun this represents, I think theeasiest
> > identification is with the short-vowel type, of which it wouldbe a
> > perfect collective, **bhér-H2 > *bhé:r(H2).why did
>
> That could very well be the case, and the phonological development
> looks regular there. However, if that happened to *bhérx, then
> *mégx not become *me:g?Because it was **még^-eH2 that became *még^H2.