Re: [tied] *kW- "?"

On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:09:17 +0200, Piotr Gasiorowski
<gpiotr@...> wrote:

>The a-colouring effect of *k, *g and *gH was not as strong as in the
>case of *h2, and the resulting vowel was not always phonemicised as
>different from fundamental *e.

It won't do to leave that to random alternation. There has
to be a rule to explain why we have both *ka and *ke.

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...