Re: Re[2]: [tied] *kW- "?"

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 40104
Date: 2005-09-18

On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 09:39:31 -0500, Patrick Ryan
<proto-language@...> wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>
><snip>
>
> It follows that the
>> uvular articulation was lost somewhere before the PIE merger
>> of most short stressed vowels to *e.
>
>***
>Patrick:
>
>I am not surprised when some misuse "uvular" but I am when you misuse it.
>
>The uvula is not at all involved in the production of back- or post-velar
>consonants.

Yes it is.


=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...