From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 39844
Date: 2005-09-01
>> Show me one athematic neuter wich is stressed onIn other words: there are no hysterodynamic neuters, m-stems
>> the suffix (hysterodynamic), and we can talk.
>
>Alright. That's a comment worth responding to. The
>problem is that these stems in *-om are in fact the
>only possible evidence you are looking for!
>Ironically, you yourself are ignoring the fact thatI'm not ignoring that at all. You, on the other hand, are
>the accentuation is on the final syllable in *yugom.
>Now, it's highly odd that only thematic stems wouldThere's nothing odd about oxytone neuter thematics:
>acquire this oxytone accentuation.