From: tgpedersen
Message: 39842
Date: 2005-09-01
>root
> But what's your basis for believing that all root presents are
> secondary? There're quite a few of them and they're well in evidence
> everywhere, including Anatolian. It seems more likely to me that
> presents and root aorists are equally ancient. If a durative verbhad to
> be derived from an aorist, the most common morphological markerswere
> *-je/o- or *-sk^e/o-, or a nasal infix.I proposed the infix *-ye- was originally an independent verb *ye-,