Re: [tied] 1sg.pers.pron.

From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 38687
Date: 2005-06-17

> Ah. That "g^" would be a palatized "g", right?

The one that became an affricate/fricative in the Satem languages, cf.
Slavic *(j)azU < *e:z- < *h1eg^-.

Piotr