[tied] Re: sum

> >
> >That is what would I would have meant, if I had thought they were
> >athematic which I clearly stated that I think they're not.
> >I mean *stu-ónti and *h1s-ónti, since I think they are semi-

thematic.

>
> I you wish to call an athematic verb semi-thematic, then I
> guess you're semi-correct.
>

I think *st-w- originally followed the paradigm I hope we both agree
on calling semi-thematic.

I might be right and I might be wrong.
That's why I'm semi-right, unlike some people who are right all the
time.


Torsten