[tied] Re: sum

From: tgpedersen
Message: 38468
Date: 2005-06-09

>
> >And the /o/ of *wókW-m. 'voice', Avest.
> > va:cim, Toch.AB wak, wek?
> Where did the labialisation go? Note Gk. epos. *wekW- > *wok- vs
> *we-kWV ?
>
>
>
> Why is there -o- in Gk. kló:ps 'thief',
> > and why -e- in phré:n, phréna?
> Should I add 'labial' to the list of o-makers?
>

*-eH3- > -o:- . *-ekW- > -o:k-?


Torsten