>I have a question here Miguel. Why was there a need to maintain a
>difference between conjugations?
>Alex
As I already shows to Miguel and Aquila there isn't any "General
Need"...to maintain this differences...
Otherwise Miguel will be obliged to declare tomorrow based
on 'his theory' (in fact is not 'his theory' is a "well-known"
Latinist explanation) that "the English language" couldn't exist
today as a language because 'it couldn't maintain distinct
differences'...
So Miguel as a serious linguist needs to add more here: by
explaining the "specific causes" that "triggered" this phenomenon
and clearly identify the "context" and these "specific causes"
Until then it will remain an "ad-hoc" explanation ...like "i- the
marked of the plural in Rom doi", "the front a- that was taken from
the previous word in the phrase to explain Rom. asta" etc...."the i-
that was spreading from a conjugation to another one" etc...
Best Regards,
Marius Alexandru