Re: [tied] Romanian Verb Endings and Substratum influence (repost)

From: alex
Message: 38230
Date: 2005-06-01

Miguel Carrasquer wrote:
> The only conjugation to maintain a difference between 2 and
> 3 sg. was the i-conjugation, so teh 2sg. ending -i spread to
> the other conjugations. This was no doubt aided by the fact
> that in monosyllables -s had become -j (It. hai, stai, dai,
> fai, (s)ei; Rom. ai, stai, dai).
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...


I have a question here Miguel. Why was there a need to maintain a
difference between conjugations?

Alex




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.2.0 - Release Date: 27.05.2005