Re: Romanian Verb Endings and Substratum influence (repost)

>I don't remember if that was last year or two years ago where I
>showed the same aspect of Lithuanian and Rom. to Miguel. At that time
>he said it is just a coincidence and most important thing, Rom. has 4
>conjugations as Latin have had.

I don't want to upset Miguel but if he thinks that this is a
coincidence I would ask him to write on a paper six numbers (from 1
to 6) and next to throw a die to see how many time he will guess all
the 6 numbers from 6 (similar with the 6 endings)

He can repeat this trial how many times he wants...

After several years maybe he can guess 5 from the 6 cases (Latin
situation) but for 6 from 6 he will need more times than a single
life.

Best Regards,
Marius

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "altamix" <alxmoeller@...> wrote:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3"
<alexandru_mg3@...>
> wrote:
> > => All forms fit perfectly.
> >
> >
> >
> > FIRST CONCLUSIONS:
> > a) At Indic. Pres. Romanian endings are exactly the same with
> > Lithuanian Endings
> > b) Romanian 2nd sg. doesn't fit with Latin 2nd sg.
>
>
> I don't remember if that was last year or two years ago where I
> showed the same aspect of Lithuanian and Rom. to Miguel. At that
time
> he said it is just a coincidence and most important thing, Rom. has
4
> conjugations as Latin have had.
> In fact that is not true, but this is a matter of systematisation.
> the true is, Rom. has minimum 5 conjugation and maximum 7 if one
will
> to build a separate system for the verbs which are conjugated with -
> ez and -esc.
> That is, there are 5 conjugations with the stem of the infinitive,
> one with -ez and one with -esc.
>
> Alex