From: Petusek
Message: 38066
Date: 2005-05-25
pleophony>Actually, the characteristically East Slavic (Ukrainian/Rusyn)
>in the word rules out any such fantastic story. Like Polish<Wol/och>,
>the name must have been originally applied to immigrantcommunities
>speaking Romanian. Of course <Vlach>, with the normalCzech treatment of
>the Germanic loan (cf. Polish Wl/och), referred towhatever
>Romance-speakers the early Germans and Slavs in these partswere likely
>to have some knowledge of just before they learnt tometathesise their
>liquids :), which in the case of the western Slavs(unlike the eastern
>and southern ones) meant Italians rather thanRomanians. The fact that
>in the centuries that followed their Germanneighbours continued to use
>the terms <Walch> and <welsch>with reference to Italians only
>reinforced theidentification.