Re: [tied] *pak-, *pah2

From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 37437
Date: 2005-04-28

I went to the message and found the following entry:
 
pa[']&n "(what serves a fodder =) bait", *pah2-
This corresponds to what I would reconstruct for PIE, namely
 
*pa-?a, 'flat' + stative (inanimate)
 
So, 'to have grazed' is 'to have flattened', a perfectly good visual description of 'grazing'.
 
Perhaps there is a reflex of *pa-ha, 'flat' + stative (animate) there that I missed?
 
 
Patrick
 
----- Original Message -----
From: tgpedersen
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:05 AM
Subject: [tied] *pak-, *pah2

> In IE, the feminine suffix *-ih2 is obviously the
> unthematized counterpart of diminutive *-ik-o-.

That (pre-PIE?) rule (-k# >-h2#) seems to be standard now?
That would lead me to believe that the roots *pak- (with "sideform"
*pag-, suspiciously called "perfectly natural" by root
editors) "pole;peace;country;border" (whew!) and *pah2- "let graze,
guard, herd". Anyone one who accepts the jumble of senses of the
former will not be able with a good conscience to criticize that
merger on sematic grounds. But that merged root has has suspiciously
similar cousins in Proto-Austronesian (cf
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/37244
), so this root is no good candidate for proving the PIE nativeness of
neither plain *k nor *a.

Torsten






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EA3HyD/3MnJAA/79vVAA/GP4qlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    cybalist-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/