From: CG
Message: 36883
Date: 2005-03-30
> > There is no etymological connection between Net/Neit andsuch
> Nuadu/Nodens.
>
> I have seen multiple authors such as Miranda Green and James
> MacKillop state otherwise. Have you come across any evidence why
> linguistic changes (such as Neit to Nod) are unlikely?I have read both Green and MacKillop and never come across any such
> As to stemming from *neud, I have seen that proposed. However aswith
> many aspects of PIE reconstruction, the matter seems open to someYes - this is the same root that I mentioned.
> debate. The following is taken from some work I was doing comparing
> Nuada and Sax-not and possible etymologies:
>
> Linguistic option 1)
> "Not" from the Gmc. *neutan- was 'to profit from sth, make good use
> of sth' (hence 'enjoy', 'consume', etc.).
> And is connected with the root *neud- 'use, enjoy, possess', known
> from Germanic and Baltic
> Linguistic option 2)That's impossible, at least as far as Brittonic and Proto-Irish
> The again, the name may instead stem from: *nedh/nodus.
> Taken directly from Dumezil's `Mitra-Varuna' pg 99:
> "from the root *nedh-, `to bind', which is also that of
> nodus, `knot', Sanskrit naddha-, `fastened', Irish naidim, `I bind'"
> The second edition of the American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-
> European Roots expresses the root as *ned to bind, tie. The O-grade
> form is *nod-. and is the root of such words as knot and net.
> Linguistic option 3)I
> This is the possibility of the term stemming from some word
> meaning "to protect". Having checked out a few online dictionaries
> can say that the Welsh terms are accurate.Also seems extremely unlikely to me given the differences in the
> At this point I cannot confirm nor deny the other tems involved
> (Irish nacht and Sanskrit nud- and nudati)