Re: [tied] Re: Mi- and hi-conjugation in Germanic

From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 36693
Date: 2005-03-10

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 05:48:08 +0100, Miguel Carrasquer
<mcv@...> wrote:

>The van Coetsem theory, on the other hand, explains the NW
>Germanic facts quite elegantly.

In Schönfeld & van Loey's historical grammar of Dutch, on
page

http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/scho074hist01/scho074hist01_0009.htm

it is suggested, without reference, that Brugmann also
thought Class VII in NWGmc was Ablaut, not contraction.

A further Web search turned up "Reduplication and the Old
English strong verbs [of?] class VII , Studia Anglica
Posnaniensia: international review of English Studies;
Author: Adamczyk, Elz.bieta", but in order to read it, you
have to give your credit card number to some people called
"High Beam Research", which I don't want to do.

The logical person to ask whether the article contains any
relevant material (or is interesting otherwise) would be
Piotr. No?

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
mcv@...