From: Miguel Carrasquer
Message: 35932
Date: 2005-01-15
>----- Original Message -----Well, I don't think so. The whole point of Balto-Slavic
>From: "Miguel Carrasquer" <mcv@...>
>To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 6:00 PM
>Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Various loose thoughts
>
>
>>The PIE (athematic) mobile paradigms had end-stress in the
>>plural oblique (*-mós, *-sú, *-mí:s), so what one expects is
>>end-stress transferred to the vowel stems.
>
>Yeah, but one may as well expect the columnal stress on the thematic vowel
>to be preserved.
>>This means that the Slavic a:-stems are regular: *-ah2-mós,My keyboard's randomly misbehaving, so please mentally
>>*-ah2-sú, *-ah2-mí:s become -á:mos, *-á:s(^)u, *-á:mi:s by
>>Hirt's law. Everything in Slavic is explained by oxytonesis
>>through Pedersen's law, and retraction by Hirt's law in the
>>ah2-stems. We cannot apply Dybo's law, because Dybo's law
>>doesn't appy
>> to mobile paradigms (just try to apply it on aI think it's much simpler and nicer to assume lateral
>>mobile o-stem singular for a laugh), and we don't need to.
>
>Not necessarilly. Dybo's Law does not apply to enclinomena forms in mobile
>paradigms because they are phonologically unaccented. It could work when the
>accent is on the thematic vowel (thus in the middle syllable of a word), it
>doesn't matter the paradigm is mobile. Thus, Dybo's Law would apply to
>*b'abu > *bab'u, to *wilk'amu > *wilkam'u, but not to *'wilku because the
>latter is not really accented in the way *b'abu is.