From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 35930
Date: 2005-01-15
> But in fact ouã does not have a plural in -ã, historically.Which is abundantly attested? Feminine plurals in -e or former
> In Romanian the old neuter pl. ending -a has been
> analogically changed to -e (after the feminine -a, pl. -e,
> something which is abundantly attested already in Vulgar
> Latin)
> make their plural in -e (lemn, bratz, corn, os, mãr, etc.).
> The same goes for ouã < oue, which goes like nove(m) > nouã,
> with the regular development -we > -wa.
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> mcv@...