From: whetex_lewx
Message: 35855
Date: 2005-01-07
>and
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "whetex_lewx" <whetex_lewx@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Today I've phoned all my kindred from Samogitia
> > (Z^emaitija) and East Auks^taitija. There aren't any obuolas'
> > there have never been any obuolas' in all Baltic dialects.sure
>
> Come on, are you being seriuos? Your kindred don't know the word,
> so "there have never been any obuolas' in all Baltic dialects"
> and "it can be only mistake or probably falsification."? I'm not
> I see any sense in continuing the discussion. If you are reallydescriptions
> interested, please do the following:
> 1. go to a library
> 2. follow the references in LKZ^ (mostly to the "Tarmiu, archyvas")
> 3. find the source (place, informant, dialectologist)
> 4. check.
>
> The latter depends on: whether there are any audiorecords or not,
> whether the informant is still alive etc. If there are no
> audiorecords and the informant is dead, of course one can always
> accuse a dialectologist of incompetence or dishonesty, but what if
> the word is registered many times by variuos dialectologists
> independently? Please also note that most of the dialect
> made after the WWII were conducted by native dialect speakersThank you for this information. I'll visit library and I'll try to
> themselves being at the same time trained linguists.
>
> In case you need assistance, you can contact the Institute of the
> Lithuanian Language (you'll find their contacts at
> http://www.lki.lt/).
>
> Sergei