From: Abdullah Konushevci
Message: 35732
Date: 2004-12-31
>i
> >Its derivation from Latin <bestia>, even semantically seems more
> >plausible, phonetically is very hard to be explained. Indeed, e >
> >is regular before a consonantal cluster, but reduction of thein
> >cluster st > sh is very unexpected in Albanian (cf. Latin crista >
> >Alb. kreshtë), for its distribution in Albanian is very high,
>
>
> I agree that the output of PAlb st is Alb sht.
> However in Lat. bestia we have tj-a : a hiatus that gave ts /c/
> Roman Times that next passed to s in Albanian :***AK: That unvoiced dental obstruent /t/ plus palatal glide /j/
>
> Ex: Lat puteus <-> PRom. putsu ; PAlb putsu > Rom. puts ; Alb pus
>
> So Lat. tj-V gave PAlb ts-V > Alb. s-V an din this case we have:
>
> Lat. bestia > [ti-a > tsa] bestsa > [s>sh ts>s] beshsë > [e>j shs
> >sh] bishë
>
> Only The Bests,
> Marius
> Sl. bic^&k& > Alb. bisk 'branch'***AK: To my view, nor Alb. <bisk> (cf. also <biskonjë> 'young
> Sl. bric^&k& > Alb. brisk 'razor' Rom. brishcã
> (please note: ORom c^k > Rom shk)
>***AK: Except Sl. <poroc^iti> that yields Alb. <porosis>, we have
> or B) nc^ (or a similar context o^c^)
> Sl. poro^c^iti > Alb. porositi Rom. porunc^i 'to command'
> These clusters gave Normally *s in Albanian based on the phoneticthis
> status in Albanian at that moment of time (see above rules) but
> Doesn't Means At All that they represents Sl. c^ > Alb. s.Konushevci
>
> Only the Bests,
> Marius