From: george knysh
Message: 35610
Date: 2004-12-23
>There is another aspect of the
> Nestor/Sylvester approach to historical events which"Bulgaria" at that
> needs to be mentioned. When they talked about
> "peoples" they almost always referred to these
> peoples' aristocracies. So we see for instance the
> odd
> contention that the "Carolingians" were a "people".
> On
> that basis my conclusions about the non-presence of
> Wallachians north of the Danube in 1116 according to
> the Kyivan Chronicle is not necessarily devastating
> for the Romanian claim. All this really meant to the
> Old Ukrainian writers is that the Wallachians were
> an
> irrelevant political and social factor in the
> territories of "Hungary" and (northern GK)
> time.*****GK: I would like to add that the expression
> If they were there, they were a leaderless (as the
> chroniclers understood "leadership"), insignificant
> set of "lower class" individuals (these writers were
> not only imperialists but also chauvinists...).
> Their
> erstwhile aristocracies, stemming from the Romans,
> had
> been historically eliminated ("chased away" as the
> Chronicle put it). So it is as if the ethnos no
> longer
> "existed"...