From: george knysh
Message: 35306
Date: 2004-12-04
> should be Dacian language.*****GK: I think Piotr made the point awhile back,
> And these who developed this hypothesis are hard at
> work since, missing
> historical records, they must proove it due the
> linguistic arguments. Are
> you aware of the linguistic arguments? Me, honestly,
> not too much. There are
> already years since I want to hear them too.