From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 35293
Date: 2004-12-04
>-
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Marius A: Not true either. Hungarian Slavic words reflecting CVrCis
> derived in fact from Hungarian older form CVrVC (where the first V
> the epenthetic vowel and the rest of the cluster reflecting theSlavic
> Methathetic form *CrVC ...like in 'szerda' < 'szereda' that clearlywas
> exemplifies my Rule above ... because Methatetic Slavic form was
> *sreda. (and not only Slavic clusters CrVC but Any CrVC cluster
> treated similar in old Hungarian)-
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>my
> In order to sustain my rule above (and until Piotr will post his
> examples 'with no epenthetic vowel' as 'normal rule') I post below
> examples that clearly shows this epenthetic vowel in todayHungarian
> Slavic Loans and not only there:Reduction to CVrC is clearly blocked by the /n/.
>
>
> 1. Hun. 'szerda' 'Wed.' < Hun. reg. 'szereda' < Sl. *sreda 'id.'
> (see also Hun. town name : 'Csikszereda' <-> Romanian 'Miercurea
> Ciuc')
>
> 2. Hun. 'szer-encse' 'luck' <-> Serb.-Cr. 'srec'a' 'happiness;
> luck'
> 3. Hun 'fogát csikorgatja' 'to gnash one's teeth ' <->Inconclusive without further explanation. It's not immediately
> Serb.-Cr. 'krgutati' 'id.,'
> and of course also the others ones that I already posted :Reduction to CVrC is blocked by the /t/.
>
> 4. kereszteny < Christianus
> 5. karacsony < Rom. 'Craciun' 'Christmas'This would be interesting if we had any confidence in the origin of