From: m_iacomi
Message: 35145
Date: 2004-11-19
>> Whose "reconstruction" is this? *-rw- would have given RomanianOf course, in CL voicing. Afterwards, /w/ shifts either to /v/
>> <-rb-, as in corb < corvu- /korwu-/. Please stop multiplying
>> absurdities.
> Ockham's Razor applies here.By far.
>> b) Secondly 'corb' is not considered by some linguists (likeActually he doesn't even respect DEX: the only two entries having
>> Academia Romana) as an inherited Latin word in Romanian.
>> See DEX (http://dexonline.ro/search.php?cuv=corb&source=)
>
> You do well to respect DEX;
> it's a pity you don't accept the etymology of <horĂ£> given there.BTW, the ritual circular dance is present as well in Catalonia,
>> made by Academia Romana that clearly indicates:It doesn't. There is no such convention. The same applies for
>>
>> "din Lat. corvus" and not "Lat. corvus"
>>
>> This 'din Lat.' is the DEX indication that is not a Latin
>> inherited word BUT was loaned via other sources or is a later
>> Latin loan [...]
>
> This is getting ridiculous. Since when does "from Latin"
> (<din Lat.>) means that the word cannot be in from Latin
> (whether borrowed or inherited, as in this case)? Where does
> the dictionary mention such a convention?